A California law that aimed to prohibit the carrying of firearms in most public places has been halted by a federal judge. The judge ruled that the law infringes upon individuals’ Second Amendment rights and hampers their capacity to protect themselves and their families.
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law in September, which was scheduled to go into effect on January 1. This law aimed to prohibit individuals from carrying concealed firearms in 26 different locations, including public parks, playgrounds, churches, banks, and zoos. It was designed to apply to both those with permits to carry concealed weapons and those without. However, privately owned businesses would be allowed to opt out of the ban by displaying signs indicating that firearms are permitted on their premises.
U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney has issued a preliminary injunction that effectively blocks the law. In his ruling, Judge Carney described the law as “sweeping” and “repugnant to the Second Amendment.” Furthermore, he stated that it was openly defiant of the Supreme Court.
The court case challenging the law will continue despite its current blockage. According to the judge, gun rights groups have a high chance of successfully proving its unconstitutionality, which would result in a permanent overturning of the law.
The California Rifle and Pistol Association has achieved a significant triumph as the court ruled in their favor, blocking the law. This law was introduced to revamp the regulations surrounding concealed carry permits in California, following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. This ruling prompted several states to take swift action in crafting their own firearm laws, as the Supreme Court emphasized that the constitutionality of such laws should align with the nation’s longstanding tradition of firearm regulation.
According to Chuck Michel, the president of the California association, progressive politicians in California are unwilling to accept the Supreme Court’s mandate from the Bruen case. They are making various attempts to circumvent the ruling, using their creativity. However, Michel asserts that the Court was able to see through the State’s tactics.
According to Michel, the implementation of the law would have restricted gun permit holders from driving across town without violating the law by passing through prohibited areas. He believes that the judge’s ruling has ultimately enhanced the safety of Californians, as criminals are less likely to engage in unlawful activities when law-abiding citizens have the means to protect themselves.
State Attorney General Rob Bonta has announced that his office will be appealing the decision. He strongly believes that if this ruling is allowed to stand, it could potentially put communities at risk by permitting the presence of firearms in locations where families and children often gather.
Governor Newsom expressed his determination to continue advocating for more stringent gun measures.
In a statement released on Wednesday evening, the governor expressed his strong opposition to the ruling, labeling it as “outrageous” and “defying common sense.” He criticized the decision for characterizing California’s data-backed gun safety measures as “repugnant.” The governor further emphasized that it is the ruling itself that is truly repugnant, as it opens the door for an increase in the presence of guns in places like hospitals, libraries, and children’s playgrounds – spaces that should be safe for everyone.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has positioned himself as a prominent figure in the realm of gun control, gaining national recognition and even sparking speculation about his potential presidential aspirations. Throughout his tenure, he has been proactive in advocating for stricter firearm regulations, spearheading the signing of numerous bills aimed at addressing various aspects of gun violence. These measures include cracking down on untraceable “ghost guns,” addressing concerns surrounding the marketing of firearms to children, and even allowing individuals to file lawsuits related to gun violence. Notably, the design of the legislation draws inspiration from a similar approach taken in Texas concerning anti-abortion laws.
Carney, a former Orange County Superior Court judge, was designated to the federal bench by President George W. Bush in 2003.
- In the Morant immunity hearing, the judge is not yet ready to rule
- Implementation of Speed Cameras in Select California Cities: New Laws in 2024